Whats wrong with Cessna 1. It appears to be personalI did a bunch of safety studies in FLYING 1. I calculated accident rates for the airplanes studied. It was no surprise that the Cessna 1. That gave the 1. 72 the best accident rate in private aviation. The airplane will always be a 1. Think of it as a Skyhawk if you wish. By comparison, the fatal accident rate for the total activity has been stuck in the 1. This Flight Simulator flight in the A2A Cessna 172 with the FlightOne GTN 750 addon covers a flight from KIMM to KAPF. The approach plate that I show was. The 1. 72 is the most built airplane in history at 4. A lot of those airplanes are quite old, a lot were exported and a bunch have been damaged beyond repair. It is probably still safe to say there are more 1. U. S. than anything else and though production rates today are relatively low, that will remain true for a long time to come. That makes it a true benchmark airplane in a lot of ways, including that good safety record. Calculating accident rates is fraught with peril and while I thought my methodology was pretty good, I am sure it had flaws. Rates that I calculated did, though, come out pretty close to rates calculated by others so I thought mine were and are as accurate as you could hope for. Package One MECB IR before CPL Private Pilots Licence 10 discount if paid in full 6,535 7,260 Night Rating 4hrs dual 1hr Solo 950. Alaskas List is a huge, online classifieds service, featuring hundreds of private aircraft being offered for sale by sellers throughout the Greatland and beyond. Piston airplanes just arent flying as many hours as they once did. Source FAAA lot has happened in and to private aviation in the time since I did those safety studies. Flying activity has dropped dramatically, airplane use has probably changed substantially, and the pilot population has changed. Maybe the biggest change in pilots is that the average age has increased almost hand in hand with the time that has passed. Cessna Training Course' title='172 Cessna Training Course' />The same thing is true of the airplanes that we fly. I think it is safe to say that any accident rate numbers developed today would be substantially more suspect than those of 1. Still, though, some numbers and information that I developed about the 1. The 1. 72 accounted for 1. In a two year period there was but one fatal 1. That was an engine failure related to a valve. There were no fatal accidents related to fuel exhaustion or starvation. Despite the good record in that area, the 1. It just appears more adaptable to impromptu arrivals than some other airplanes. The low landing speed contributes to this. How Do I Apply A Kernel Patch. There is no available statistic on this, but I would bet that most 1. NTSB classifies as an accident. I looked at fatal 1. NTSB reports were final as opposed to preliminary. There were 2. 5 such accidents in the 4. If the methodology I used years ago is applied to that number, the 1. As a matter of record, Diamond currently claims to have a better record than the 1. I have looked at their numbers and if everything is accurate they are probably right. The Diamond fleet is, however, much smaller so the inevitable yearly changes in the number of accidents would cause big changes in accident rates. I was most curious about whether or not the changing patterns in private aviation resulted in any change in the nature of 1. The quick answer is yes, there seem to have been basic changes. Remember, this is for two years which in a fleet as large as the 1. In that old study half the fatal accidents were related to time proven trespasses continuing VFR into bad weather, descending below a safe altitude while IFR, and intentional low flying but not including stallspin were all there. About 2. 0 percent of the fatal accidents were stallspin. If there was a particular phase of flight where the 1. Those big flaps, 4. Its still one of the safest airplanes in the sky, but the accident picture is changing. Over ten percent of the 1. 89C51 Programmer Software Free Download. One accident actually followed a shoot out. The pilot shot two people, killing one, and then exchanged gunfire with another person as he was taxiing out in a stolen airplane. He crashed into a wooded area 2. When looking at the accidents that occurred 1. Where darkness didnt show up much before, more recently 4. Descargar Internet Explorer 8 Para Vista 32 Bits more. Almost 2. 0 percent reflected some form of pilot incapacitation ranging from a massive heart attack to cataracts screwing up night vision to the point that the pilot couldnt function properly. Almost 3. 0 percent of the accidents in the later period were related to drugs or alcohol. Drug involvement is hard to pin down because the NTSB will often mention drug use but not include it in the probable cause. I guess that is because with alcohol there is a maximum level prescribed in the FARs where there is no such measure for drugs. Suicide or possible suicide was indicated in 2. Stallspin showed up exactly the same as before at 2. There was no gun play in the latest tally. Two of the accidents are interesting to me because of the particular human factors involved. Neither involved anything peculiar to the 1. The pilot of a 1. The pilot survived the crash and it was obvious that he had accessed on board survival gear. He died of hypothermia before he was found two days later. The airplane had an STC approved shoulder harness retrofit that failed on impact. That could have contributed to his injuries and made survival more difficult. Another pilot was returning a just bought 1. It was night and the active airline pilot had been doing a lot of flying, including several trans Atlantic flights, in recent days. The NTSB concluded that he simply went to sleep. Theres always a question about the relationship of airplane age to accidents. I dont think this proves anything but almost 4. R and 1. 72. S models, built under a new Part 2. Cessna resumed 1. The only other single models that stand out are 1. M and N models. Those were built in relatively large numbers so that is logical. Cessna once acquired what was thought to be the highest time 1. This was some time ago and, as I remember, the airplane had about 1. They subjected the airframe to every available test and the only parts of the airframe that showed any appreciable wear were the front seat tracks. Those were replaced, the airplane was put back together, and it went back on patrol. It might still be flying, perhaps still none the worse for wear. Airplanes certified over 6. FAA deserves some credit for that. There is no way to calculate the hours flown by individual models of the 1. I doubt that there would be a lot of difference in accident rates among the various models if the numbers were available to calculate those rates. The 1. 72 is thought of as a training airplane as much as it is a personal airplane but almost none of the fatal accidents and not a whole lot of the non fatal accidents occur during instructional flying. In the old two year period studied, there was one fatal 1. In the later period there were two but one of those was a midair collision, one of two in a 1. The midair occurred in a training area. That is a risk that is not related to the type airplane flown. I know, some disciples of low wing airplanes are locked and loaded to say that midairs are more related to high wing airplanes but I have never seen any factual basis for that claim. The 1. 72 record in non fatal accidents is better than the record for the private aviation fleet but this has to be taken with a lot of grains of salt. An airplane has to be substantially damaged, or someone has to be hurt more than just a little, for an event to the classified as an accident. Just by their nature, simple airplanes are less likely to be involved in what is classified as an accident. And if there is an accident, it is likely less serious in the simple airplane. The 1. 72 is probably available to more pilots than any other type and that is likely the reason that the personal problems of pilots have come to figure into more accidents in this airplane. Even though the 1.